top of page


Public·3 members

Opos Common Control Objects Version 1.13 18 ^NEW^

OPOSScale.OCX (v1.13, OPOS Scale Common Control Object) A 32-bit ActiveX Control (OCX) driver used to integrate any manufacturers scale into OPOS-compliant POS systems. The installation of this version of the scale common control object driver is optional.

Opos Common Control Objects Version 1.13 18

This scale-only OPOS common control object was extracted from the complete 1.13.001 CCO Runtime (ZIP File) release of 2010/03/01 provided by RCS; A Division of NCR; Dayton, Ohio, and as developed by MCS, Inc. It was repackaged and provided here as a convenience to customers of Avery Weigh-Tronix.

Additional Information: Programs installed while attempting to print on the pos printer are: 1. Installed APD4 Printer Driver Epson TI88IV APD_412EWM.exe =570 After this set in control panel printers I can select the printer's properties & print a test to the printer successfully. 2. Installed Microsoft POS.NET 1.12 POSfor.NET.msi =eaae202a-0fcc-406a-8fde-35713d7841ca 3. Installed Epson OPOS ADK v2.67 ADK267ER4.exe 4. Installed EPSON OPOS ADK for .NET 1.11.8 OPOSN 1 11 18.exe 5. Installed OPOS Common Control Objects 1.13.001 OPOS_CCOs_1.13.001.msi _current.htm 6. SetupPOS - Added device & Logical Name7. Check Health still throws the errors It is not initialized OPOS_E_ILLEGAL 10007 (0x00002717)

For over 20 years, biopsies have been the most frequently cited reason for kidney nonuse, accounting for one-third of all kidneys not used (Stewart et al., 2017). There is growing evidence that biopsies may not significantly augment the prediction of outcomes beyond estimates using clinical criteria (e.g., age and KDPI) (Reese et al., 2021). This is a growing concern given that over 50 percent of all kidneys removed for transplant undergo biopsy. Lentine et al. (2021) called for a randomized controlled trial of biopsy use to determine if and when a procurement biopsy should be used in the decision to accept or decline an organ offer. The OPTN's Kidney Transplantation Committee has approved a Donor Criteria to Require Kidney Biopsy proposal for public comment in early 2022 (OPTN, 2021b).

The aim of this study is to describe the experience of a tertiary referral centre in Portugal, of the placement of BAHA in children. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all children for whom hearing rehabilitation with BAHA was indicated at a central hospital, between January 2003 and December 2014. 53 children were included. The most common indications for placement of BAHA were external and middle ear malformations (n=34, 64%) and chronic otitis media with difficult to control otorrhea (n=9, 17%). The average age for BAHA placement was 10.663.44 years. The average audiometric gain was 31.57.20dB compared to baseline values, with average hearing threshold with BAHA of 19.65.79dB. The most frequent postoperative complications were related to the skin (n=15, 28%). There were no major complications. This study concludes that BAHA is an effective and safe method of hearing rehabilitation in children. Copyright 2016 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello. All rights reserved.

To assess the association of clinician referral with decision-to-abortion time. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of women seeking abortion at all three Nebraska abortion clinics. We defined referral as direct (information for an abortion clinic), inappropriate (information for a clinic that does not provide abortions) or no referral. Women reported when they recognized their pregnancy, decided to seek abortion and contacted a clinician. The primary outcome - decision-to-abortion time - was time from certain decision to abortion. We used multivariate linear regression analysis, controlling for potential confounders. Participants (n=356) were a mean of 26.85.3years old, primarily white (62%), unmarried (88%) and urban (87%), with a mean gestational duration of 8(2/7)weeks (S.D.20days). Forty-six percent (164) had contacted a clinician and 30% (104) had discussed abortion with one before their abortion. Of those, 30% received a direct referral, 6% received an inappropriate referral and 64% received no referral. Decision-to-abortion time did not vary by referral type [mean difference compared with direct referral: inappropriate referral, 1.1days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.4 to 15.6, p=.88; no referral, -0.4days, 95% CI -7.0 to 6.3]. The most common reasons cited for delay in obtaining an abortion were an inability to get an earlier appointment (105/263, 40%) and time needed to raise money to pay for the abortion (73/263, 28%). While neither occurrence of referral nor type was associated with decision-to-abortion times, women in Nebraska continue to face barriers to timely abortion care. Additional research is needed to explore whether quality clinician referral improves abortion access and whether increased resources should be dedicated to improving referral patterns. Copyright 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 350c69d7ab


Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...

Group Page: Groups_SingleGroup
bottom of page